HOME 著書・論文・ニュースレター等
The IP High Court found that Plaintiff’s configuration of goods is not qualified as "an indication of goods" under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act due to the lack of "Noticeable Feature" (Intellectual Property High Court, July 27, 2016)
論文 2017年3月

The IP High Court found that Plaintiff’s configuration of goods is not qualified as "an indication of goods" under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act due to the lack of "Noticeable Feature" (Intellectual Property High Court, July 27, 2016)

2017年3月
著者等 大石 裕太 
出版社 IP-L Communications Inc.
掲載誌・刊号 Patents & Licensing, Vol. 46, No. 5 (2017)
発行年月日 2017年3月
業務分野 知的財産/ライフサイエンス/IT等
当事務所のアソシエイト、大石裕太弁護士が執筆した記事が下記雑誌に掲載されました。

"The IP High Court found that Plaintiff’s configuration of goods is not qualified as "an indication of goods" under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act due to the lack of "Noticeable Feature" (Intellectual Property High Court, July 27, 2016)"
(Patents & Licensing, Vol. 46, No. 5 (2017))