HOME Publications
Explanatory Notes for the case where intra-company notifications that were addressed to marketing office managers and others by relevant departments of the head office of a bank and that described general business guidelines and other items were found not to be "a document that is to be used solely for the holder of the document" as prescribed in Item 4(d) of Article 220 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Supreme Court Decision Issued by the Second Petty Bench on February 17, 2006)
Articles Sep 2006

Explanatory Notes for the case where intra-company notifications that were addressed to marketing office managers and others by relevant departments of the head office of a bank and that described general business guidelines and other items were found not to be "a document that is to be used solely for the holder of the document" as prescribed in Item 4(d) of Article 220 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Supreme Court Decision Issued by the Second Petty Bench on February 17, 2006)

Sep 2006
Authors Shinji Kusakabe
Publisher Economic Legal Research Institute
Publication The Financial and Business Law Precedents No. 1249 [September 15, 2006 issue]
Issue Sep 2006
Practice Areas Corporate  Dispute Resolution